Camera Kopen » Objectieven en Lenzen » Pentax DA 16-45 mm f/4,0 ED

Pentax DA 16-45 mm f/4,0 ED

08:10

REVIEW: smc Pentax DA* 16-50mm f/2.8 [IF] SDM (part1)

This is part one of the ShutterSight Photography review of the Pentax 16-50mm lens. Part two IS UP and includes image samples. Follow us on Twitter @Shutter_sight.
00:11

PENTAX DA 17-70 F4 SDM [IF] (take 2)

Comparing the noise of AF of the kit lens DA 18-55 II F3.5-5.6 with DA 17-70 F4 SDM. Here's a review of the lens: www.photozone.de Here's a thread about DA 17-70 SDM: tinyurl.com
02:33

UNBOXING: Pentax DA* 16-50mm F2.8 AL [IF] SDM

This is a quick unboxing video of my new lens. An in-depth video review will be posted once a representative selection of images have been made with this lens. The video should come soon. Follow us on Twitter @Shutter_sight.
00:52

Pentax SMC

Get a great deal here redirect.viglink.com?key=1f0527e04637dcdb26bf99b11836bfbf&out=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eamazon%2Ecom%2Fdp%2FB0001DBZKK Customer Reviews "Ditto Dana G's review. I migrated from a pretty extensive Nikon film system, and have used all kinds of other brands of film camera equipment, either on assignment or as a community college photo instructor during the 70's and 80's. I tried a variety of zooms, including varifocals with ELD glass. They were visibly softer than their equivalent single-focal-length counterparts. I noticed this after I had spent a long time using one particular varifocal. One day I switched back to a prime and when the prints came in, WOW! You could even tell with a casual glance at a 3X5 proof, that there was a huge difference. And the wide angle range in those 1970'5 and 80's zooms alway seemed extra soft and distorted. So I just gave up on zooms until I experienced digital.I'm not one of those people who photographs charts. But I've a LOT of experience looking at real world images. In fact, as long as the lens seems to be working I don't really pay attention to it. However, in this case, I was shooting some photos of rocks along the Maine coast, from a tripod, and I decided to try to use a few Pentax prime lenses--a 40mm SMCP DA 2.8 and the Pentax FA 50mm 1.4--just to see if zooms had improved. All shots were in the 35-60 mm range, around f5.6-f8. When I uploaded these images into Photoshop, I was flabbergasted. The 16-45 mm gave nicer ...
00:57

Pentax SMC

Get the best offer here redirect.viglink.com?key=f341fd9454fc162be8b38d504acbd4e1&out=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eamazon%2Ecom%2Fdp%2FB0001DBZKK Customer Reviews "Ditto Dana G's review. I migrated from a pretty extensive Nikon film system, and have used all kinds of other brands of film camera equipment, either on assignment or as a community college photo instructor during the 70's and 80's. I tried a variety of zooms, including varifocals with ELD glass. They were visibly softer than their equivalent single-focal-length counterparts. I noticed this after I had spent a long time using one particular varifocal. One day I switched back to a prime and when the prints came in, WOW! You could even tell with a casual glance at a 3X5 proof, that there was a huge difference. And the wide angle range in those 1970'5 and 80's zooms alway seemed extra soft and distorted. So I just gave up on zooms until I experienced digital.I'm not one of those people who photographs charts. But I've a LOT of experience looking at real world images. In fact, as long as the lens seems to be working I don't really pay attention to it. However, in this case, I was shooting some photos of rocks along the Maine coast, from a tripod, and I decided to try to use a few Pentax prime lenses--a 40mm SMCP DA 2.8 and the Pentax FA 50mm 1.4--just to see if zooms had improved. All shots were in the 35-60 mm range, around f5.6-f8. When I uploaded these images into Photoshop, I was flabbergasted. The 16-45 mm gave nicer ...
00:56

Pentax SMC

Buy from Amazon US redirect.viglink.com?key=f341fd9454fc162be8b38d504acbd4e1&out=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eamazon%2Ecom%2Fexec%2Fobidos%2FASIN%2FB0001DBZKK%2Felectro%5Fhope%2D20 Customer Reviews "Ditto Dana G's review. I migrated from a pretty extensive Nikon film system, and have used all kinds of other brands of film camera equipment, either on assignment or as a community college photo instructor during the 70's and 80's. I tried a variety of zooms, including varifocals with ELD glass. They were visibly softer than their equivalent single-focal-length counterparts. I noticed this after I had spent a long time using one particular varifocal. One day I switched back to a prime and when the prints came in, WOW! You could even tell with a casual glance at a 3X5 proof, that there was a huge difference. And the wide angle range in those 1970'5 and 80's zooms alway seemed extra soft and distorted. So I just gave up on zooms until I experienced digital.I'm not one of those people who photographs charts. But I've a LOT of experience looking at real world images. In fact, as long as the lens seems to be working I don't really pay attention to it. However, in this case, I was shooting some photos of rocks along the Maine coast, from a tripod, and I decided to try to use a few Pentax prime lenses--a 40mm SMCP DA 2.8 and the Pentax FA 50mm 1.4--just to see if zooms had improved. All shots were in the 35-60 mm range, around f5.6-f8. When I uploaded these images into Photoshop, I was ...
02:00

Pentax K10D + DA 16-45/4 AF Speed

This video shows us an example of Pentax AF speed.