» » Tokina ATX 2,8/11-16 DX C/AF

Tokina ATX 2,8/11-16 DX C/AF

Tokina ATX 2,8/11-16 DX C/AF


  • Tokina AT-X 116 PRO DX 11-16mm f/2.8 super wide angle lens

    Brief video tour of Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8, the best wide angle lens up to date.

  • Tokina AF

    Acquista da Amazon Italy www.amazon.it Descrizione prodotto Tokina AF Tokina ATX 2,8/11-16 DX C/AF per Canon Rivelazione: Neukom partecipa al Programma Affiliazione Amazon EU, un programma di affiliazione che consente ai siti di percepire una commissione pubblicitaria pubblicizzando e fornendo link al sito Amazon.it. Amazon e il logo Amazon sono marchi registrati di Amazon, Inc. o delle sue affiliate.

  • Tokina ATX

    Buy from Amazon UK Site redirect.viglink.com?key=f8c1c5d8cab36f6602011db4ae07e5bc&out=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eamazon%2Eco%2Euk%2Fdp%2FB0014Z3XMC Customer Reviews "It was very difficult choosing between this and the Canon 10-22mm, the Canon offering obviously slightly bigger range than the Tokina. And Tokina offering F2.8 compared to Canon's F4.0, which is quite a big difference. Both having excellent optics, but with the general consensus seeming to be that Tokina would the winner in optics (if one had to choose). And Tokina also being the slightly cheaper one, but not by much. Oh and the Tokina comes with a lens hood; now this may not seem like much, but a lens hood is pretty much mandatory if you're planning on shooting in daylight with a wide angle lens. So with Canon, you would still have to fork out some extra cash for that despite the higher price.So really the only thing that was worrying me was the short range on Tokina that have made some people to say that this is actually a prime lens. And I suppose it holds some merit, but even the 6mm range is quite a lot in the short end. Yes, I would had liked to have the 1mm extra to go to 10mm and yes the 17-22mm on the long end was tempting, but in the end, you know what, the 11-16mm seems to be enough.Now after getting this, I haven't been disappointed. It is rarely I put on my Sigma 18-200mm lens anymore. The difference on the image quality is just too much to bear. The pictures are very sharp and there is very little <b>...</b>